also, the load time did not change here, or maybe got a bit slower
Posted 23 May 2011 - 07:59 AM (#21)
also, the load time did not change here, or maybe got a bit slower
Posted 23 May 2011 - 08:38 AM (#22)
dida, on 23 May 2011 - 07:59 AM, said:
also, the load time did not change here, or maybe got a bit slower
wut?? who said something of usa??
a hoopy frood who really knows where his towel is. ~~~ gibbonweb | github | hdr photographymy wife has a new DIY/decorations/floristry blog, wanna take a look? (stay tuned for English translations...)
Posted 23 May 2011 - 08:51 AM (#23)
gibbonweb, on 23 May 2011 - 08:38 AM, said:
People on page 1 if i remember good. Cba to look at it again.
Posted 23 May 2011 - 08:59 AM (#24)
3 * 16 ms 16 ms 10.1.3.178 4 16 ms * 16 ms sw1.tc.lon.ovh.net [195.66.224.220] 5 20 ms 20 ms 19 ms rbx-g2-a9.fr.eu [91.121.131.177] 6 20 ms * 103 ms vss-3-6k.fr.eu [213.251.130.77] 7 20 ms 20 ms 20 ms ns366907.ovh.net [188.165.235.145]
My personal blog and gallery, imvin.co.uk
watch me on deviantART
follow me on twitter
Posted 23 May 2011 - 09:03 AM (#25)
Posted 23 May 2011 - 09:04 AM (#26)
Koen, on 23 May 2011 - 09:03 AM, said:
/betterthangoogle
Posted 23 May 2011 - 09:07 AM (#27)
Quote
Posted 23 May 2011 - 09:08 AM (#28)
Posted 23 May 2011 - 09:30 AM (#30)
PING www.webdevrefinery.com (188.165.235.145): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 188.165.235.145: icmp_seq=0 ttl=54 time=239.390 ms
64 bytes from 188.165.235.145: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=55.686 ms
64 bytes from 188.165.235.145: icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=108.698 ms
64 bytes from 188.165.235.145: icmp_seq=3 ttl=54 time=199.539 ms
64 bytes from 188.165.235.145: icmp_seq=4 ttl=54 time=24.105 ms
64 bytes from 188.165.235.145: icmp_seq=5 ttl=54 time=182.111 ms
64 bytes from 188.165.235.145: icmp_seq=6 ttl=54 time=278.944 ms
64 bytes from 188.165.235.145: icmp_seq=7 ttl=54 time=386.247 ms
64 bytes from 188.165.235.145: icmp_seq=8 ttl=54 time=383.428 ms
64 bytes from 188.165.235.145: icmp_seq=9 ttl=54 time=25.472 ms
--- www.webdevrefinery.com ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 24.105/188.362/386.247/128.703 ms
Quote
Posted 23 May 2011 - 11:14 AM (#32)
Posted 23 May 2011 - 12:07 PM (#34)
AwesomezGuy, on 23 May 2011 - 12:00 PM, said:
Nonono
You live in Ireland, so you get the fastest connection. It's not discriminating by race -__-
Twitter | GitHub | phpBB Contributor and Website Team Member | lynxphp
Posted 23 May 2011 - 12:09 PM (#35)
traceroute to webdevrefinery.com (188.165.235.145), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets 1 192.168.1.254 (192.168.1.254) 1.741 ms 1.363 ms 1.061 ms 2 * b-ras1.mgr.mullingar.eircom.net (159.134.155.13) 27.233 ms 28.674 ms 3 tenge-4-2-1.pe1.mgr.dbc-mgr.eircom.net (86.43.247.137) 29.490 ms 28.571 ms 26.890 ms 4 tenge-5-2-1.core1.srl.core.eircom.net (86.43.253.117) 30.682 ms 35.772 ms 32.968 ms 5 tenge-2-2-1.pe1.thn.the-thn.eircom.net (86.43.253.114) 40.378 ms 47.680 ms 40.373 ms 6 ge7-1-0.corea.thn.london.eircom.net (86.43.244.194) 40.248 ms 41.032 ms 41.244 ms 7 * * * 8 rbx-g2-a9.fr.eu (94.23.122.117) 56.579 ms 56.675 ms 61.431 ms 9 vss-3-6k.fr.eu (213.251.130.77) 56.037 ms * 107.970 ms 10 ns366907.ovh.net (188.165.235.145) 57.304 ms 56.503 ms 56.598 ms
From Ireland. -.-
Ping about ~60ms though I do have a pretty bad connection.
We all die. The goal isn't to live forever. The goal is to create something that will.
Array(16).join({}-{}) + " Batman!";
Posted 23 May 2011 - 02:02 PM (#36)
not really...
Quote
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 1 ms 2 ms 1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 11 ms 11 ms 10 ms 96.128.104.1
3 10 ms 11 ms 9 ms 68.87.158.1
4 10 ms 11 ms 10 ms be-29-ar01.woburn.ma.boston.comcast.net [68.85.6
9.97]
5 14 ms 13 ms 12 ms pos-0-1-0-0-ar01.needham.ma.boston.comcast.net [
68.85.162.145]
6 17 ms 19 ms 19 ms pos-2-5-0-0-cr01.newyork.ny.ibone.comcast.net [6
8.86.90.65]
7 20 ms 96 ms 97 ms tengigabitethernet2-3.ar5.NYC1.gblx.net [64.211.
60.129]
8 96 ms * 96 ms ldn-1-6k.uk.eu [94.23.122.78]
9 98 ms 100 ms 98 ms rbx-g1-a9.fr.eu [94.23.122.66]
10 * 96 ms 98 ms vss-3-6k.fr.eu [94.23.122.237]
11 96 ms 100 ms 97 ms ns366907.ovh.net [188.165.235.145]
Trace complete.
97ms ping.
Posted 23 May 2011 - 02:25 PM (#37)
PING webdevrefinery.com (188.165.235.145): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 188.165.235.145: icmp_seq=0 ttl=56 time=38.983 ms 64 bytes from 188.165.235.145: icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=36.870 ms 64 bytes from 188.165.235.145: icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=35.773 ms 64 bytes from 188.165.235.145: icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=34.902 ms 64 bytes from 188.165.235.145: icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=36.434 ms 64 bytes from 188.165.235.145: icmp_seq=5 ttl=56 time=35.596 ms ^C --- webdevrefinery.com ping statistics --- 6 packets transmitted, 6 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 34.902/36.426/38.983/1.302 ms
I had a bit of a blond moment there, I saw 188. and thought it was my IP address and started turning it into xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx, lol.
Posted 23 May 2011 - 11:52 PM (#38)
Quote
Posted 24 May 2011 - 12:05 AM (#39)
Oh and the site seems same as always... I might ping it on my computer after I sleep.
Posted 24 May 2011 - 02:03 AM (#40)
Mo3, on 23 May 2011 - 11:52 PM, said:
I still get them. Maybe check your spam folder?

Repeat after me: jQuery is not JavaScript. It is not the answer to every JavaScript-related question. When you have to write some JavaScript, do not instantly react with "Oh, I'll do that with jQuery!"






Cartoon Clouds
Mountains
Sunrise
Clouds
Green Clouds
None

























Help